Measuring Up to the Model:

A Tool for Comparing State Charter School Laws

 

 
View by Model Law
View by State
back to index




Map Ratings:
 

Select a charter law component to see its rating on the map

STATE > Arkansas



TOTAL SCORE: 122 out of 228
RANK: 25

Arkansas’s score increased from 113 points in 2012 to 122 points this year. Its ranking went from #17 (out of 42) to #25 (out of 43). This drop had more to do with the aggressive changes made in other states than with any steps backward in Arkansas.


The score change was because of adjustments in our methodology for Components #2, #12, #15, #18, and #19.


Potential areas for improvement include creating additional authorizing options, increasing operational autonomy, ensuring equitable operational funding and equitable access to capital funding and facilities, and enacting statutory guidelines for relationships between public charter schools and educational service providers.



How does this state compare to the model law?
Model Law Component Matches Arkansas's Charter Law Rating Weight Total Score
No Caps  
Arkansas law provides that an unlimited number of conversion charter schools may exist.  Arkansas law provides that the number of open enrollment charters that are allowed automatically increases by five each time the number of schools comes within two slots of the cap, which is initially set at 24.  In addition,  Arkansas law allows high-performing open enrollment charter schools to petition the state board of education for additional sites that do not count against the cap. Although such provisions now allow adequate room for charter school growth, the state board of education may still impose a cap on the number of students that open enrollment charter schools may enroll. As of the 2011-12 school year, there were 12 conversion charter schools and 19 open enrollment charter schools in operation.
3
3 9
1A. No limits are placed on the number of public charter schools or students (and no geographic limits).
Some
1B. If caps exist, adequate room for growth.
Some
A Variety of Public Charter Schools Allowed  
Arkansas law allows new start-ups, public school conversions, and virtual schools.
4
2 8
2A. New start ups.
Yes
2B. Public school conversions.
Yes
2C. Virtual schools.
Yes
Multiple Authorizers Available  
Arkansas law requires conversion charter schools to be approved by the local school board and the state board of education. It requires new start-up charter schools (or open enrollment charter schools) to be approved by the local school board and the state board of education or by the state board of education only if an applicant appeals a local school board's denial to the state board of education.
1
3 3
3A. Two or more viable authorizing options for each applicant with direct application allowed to each authorizing option.
No
Authorizer and Overall Program Accountability System Required  
Arkansas law requires the state department of education to conduct an annual evaluation of all open-enrollment charter schools, with core elements detailed including student scores, attendance, grades, discipline incidents, socioeconomic data, parent and student satisfaction, and compliance with reporting requirements.

Arkansas law requires the state board of education to report on the status of the open-enrollment public charter school programs to the General Assembly each biennium and to the House Interim Committee on Education and the Senate Interim Committee on Education during the interim between regular sessions of the General Assembly.
1
3 3
4A. At least a registration process for local school boards to affirm their interest in chartering to the state.
No
4B. Application process for other eligible authorizing entities.
N/A
4C. Authorizer submission of annual report, which summarizes the agency's authorizing activities as well as the performance of its school portfolio.
No
4D. A regular review process by authorizer oversight body.
No
4E. Authorizer oversight body with authority to sanction authorizers, including removal of authorizer right to approve schools.
No
4F. Periodic formal evaluation of overall state charter school program and outcomes.
Yes
Adequate Authorizer Funding  
Currently, the state department of education has allocated a staff position out of their budget to oversee the charter program, which includes traditional reporting accountability for such departmental funds (but no required specific separate reporting of authorizer expenditures).
0
2 0
5A. Adequate funding from authorizing fees (or other sources).
No
5B. Guaranteed funding from authorizing fees (or from sources not subject to annual legislative appropriations).
No
5C. Requirement to publicly report detailed authorizer expenditures.
No
5D. Separate contract for any services purchased from an authorizer by a school.
No
5E. Prohibition on authorizers requiring schools to purchase services from them.
No
Transparent Charter Application, Review, and Decision-making Processes  
Arkansas law and regulation require that a consistent form (as created by the state department of education) must be used by all charter applicants. In addition, detailed timelines exist regarding the core aspects of the charter application, review, and decision-making process.Arkansas law and regulation include details regarding petition application contents and processes for conversion schools, as well as open enrollment schools. They also detail the conditions under which a successful open enrollment school may petition the state board for a license to open an additional site (i.e., replication).

Arkansas law requires that decisions regarding approvals must be made in a public meeting and that denials of charter applications must be in writing and include reasons for such disapproval. It requires decisions about open enrollment charter schools to involve a hearing with the state board, including in-person testimony and questions.

Although not required by statute, the state board of education uses review criteria recommended by the National Association of Charter School Authorizers.
3
4 12
6A. Application elements for all schools.
Yes
6B. Additional application elements specific to conversion schools.
Yes
6C. Additional application elements specific to virtual schools.
No
6D. Additional application elements specific when using educational service providers.
Yes
6E. Additional application elements specific to replications.
Yes
6F. Authorizer-issued request for proposals (including application requirements and approval criteria).
Yes
6G. Thorough evaluation of each application including an in-person interview and a public meeting.
Yes
6H. All charter approval or denial decisions made in a public meeting, with authorizers stating reasons for denials in writing.
Yes
Performance-Based Charter Contracts Required  
Arkansas law requires that the charter must be in the form of a written contract signed by the authorizer and the chief operating officer of the charter school (but there is no requirement that it be signed by the charter school governing board).Arkansas law includes a long list of charter contract contents focused on school responsibilities (but nothing regarding roles and responsibilities of the authorizer).

Arkansas law specifies that the charter contract provides that the continuation or renewal of the charter is contingent on acceptable student performance on assessment instruments adopted by the state board and on compliance with any accountability provisions specified within the charter. It also provides that the charter contract must establish the level of student performance that is considered acceptable for continuance and renewal (but it does not list a minimum set of essential measures and metrics).

Arkansas law provides that the initial term of a charter is five years.
2
4 8
7A. Being created as a separate document from the application and executed by the governing board of the charter school and the authorizer.
Some
7B. Defining the roles, powers, and responsibilities for the school and its authorizer.
Some
7C. Defining academic and operational performance expectations by which the school will be judged, based on a performance framework that includes measures and metrics for, at a minimum, student academic proficiency and growth, achievement gaps, attendance, recurrent enrollment, postsecondary readiness (high schools), financial performance, and board stewardship (including compliance).
Some
7D. Providing an initial term of five operating years (or a longer term with periodic high-stakes reviews).
Yes
7E. Including requirements addressing the unique environments of virtual schools, if applicable.
No
Comprehensive Charter School Monitoring and Data Collection Processes  
Arkansas law and regulations require each charter school to provide an annual report to parents, the community, and the state board.

Arkansas law requires that open-enrollment charter schools submit its scores for all students enrolled for standardized assessments to the state department of education within ten calendar days of the close of the fourth quarter of each school year.

While the law does not require authorizers to produce and publish annual school performance reports aligned with the performance framework set forth in each charter as provided in the model law, the law requires the state department to conduct an annual evaluation of all charter schools, with core elements detailed including student scores, attendance, grades, discipline incidents, socioeconomic data, parent and student satisfaction, on-site monitoring, and other terms of the school’s charter.

Arkansas law provides that charter schools are subject to the same auditing and accounting requirements as any other public school district, including an annual fiscal audit.

Arkansas law provides the state board with the authority to require charter schools to appear before them to discuss the results of the state department's annual evaluation and to present further information as needed. It requires the state board to notify the charter school of any concerns, and allows schools to request a hearing on these concerns. It also provides the state board with the authority to modify a charter, place it on probation, revoke, or deny renewal.
3
4 12
8A. The collection and analysis of student outcome data at least annually by authorizers (consistent with performance framework outlined in the contract).
Some
8B. Financial accountability for charter schools (e.g., Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, independent annual audit reported to authorizer).
Yes
8C. Authorizer authority to conduct or require oversight activities.
Yes
8D. Annual school performance reports produced and made public by each authorizer.
Some
8E. Authorizer notification to their schools of perceived problems, with opportunities to remedy such problems.
Yes
8F. Authorizer authority to take appropriate corrective actions or exercise sanctions short of revocation.
Yes
Clear Processes for Renewal, Nonrenewal, and Revocation Decisions  
Arkansas law requires the state department of education to conduct an annual evaluation of all charter schools, with core elements detailed including student scores, attendance, grades, discipline incidents, socioeconomic data, parent and student satisfaction, compliance with statutory reporting requirements, and other terms of the school’s charter.

Arkansas law and regulations outline a transparent process for review and renewal. While they do not specify criteria for renewal, they provide criteria for non-renewal. In addition, they require each charter school to establish the level of student performance that is considered acceptable for continuation or renewal.

Arkansas law provides that the terms of the renewal may be one year or multi-year (up to five years for conversion charter schools and up to 20 years for open enrollment charter schools).

Arkansas law requires the state board to notify via certified mail of alleged violations of the school's charter contract. As provided by Arkansas law, due process procedures include an opportunity for a hearing to the persons operating the charter school and to the parents of students enrolled in the school.

Arkansas law and regulation detail information regarding school non-renewal or revocation issues in relation to dispersement of assets, but are silent on parent notification and student and record transitions.
4
4 16
9A. Authorizer must issue school performance renewal reports to schools whose charter will expire the following year.
Yes
9B. Schools seeking renewal must apply for it.
Yes
9C. Authorizers must issue renewal application guidance that provides an opportunity for schools to augment their performance record and discuss improvements and future plans.
Yes
9D. Clear criteria for renewal and nonrenewal/revocation.
Yes
9E. Authorizers must ground renewal decisions based on evidence regarding the school's performance over the term of the charter contract (in accordance with the performance framework set forth in the charter contract).
Yes
9F. Authorizer authority to vary length of charter renewal contract terms based on performance or other issues.
Yes
9G. Authorizers must provide charter schools with timely notification of potential revocation or non-renewal (including reasons) and reasonable time to respond.
Yes
9H. Authorizers must provide charter schools with due process for nonrenewal and revocation decisions (e.g., public hearing, submission of evidence).
Yes
9I. All charter renewal, non-renewal, and revocation decisions made in a public meeting, with authorizers stating reasons for non-renewals and revocations in writing.
Yes
9J. Authorizers must have school closure protocols to ensure timely parent notification, orderly student and record transitions, and property and asset disposition.
Some
Educational Service Providers Allowed  
Arkansas law is silent regarding these arrangements. Thus, there is nothing explicit in law which prevents schools from contracting with educational service providers to operate a school nor guides the state board in their review of such provisions.
0
2 0
10A. All types of educational service providers (both for-profit and non-profit) explicitly allowed to operate all or parts of schools.
No
10B. The charter application requires 1) performance data for all current and past schools operated by the ESP, including documentation of academic achievement and (if applicable) school management success; and 2) explanation and evidence of the ESP's capacity for successful growth while maintaining quality in existing schools.
No
10C. A performance contract is required between the independent public charter school board and the ESP, setting forth material terms including but not limited to: performance evaluation measures; methods of contract oversight and enforcement by the charter school board; compensation structure and all fees to be paid to the ESP; and conditions for contract renewal and termination.
No
10D. The material terms of the ESP performance contract must be approved by the authorizer prior to charter approval.
No
10E. School governing boards operating as entities completely independent of any educational service provider (e.g., must retain independent oversight authority of their charter schools, and cannot give away their authority via contract).
No
10F. Existing and potential conflicts of interest between the two entities are required to be disclosed and explained in the charter application.
No
Fiscally and Legally Autonomous Schools, with Independent Public Charter School Boards  
Arkansas law requires conversion charter schools to remain a part of the local school district which approved them.
Arkansas law requires that open enrollment charter schools become fiscally and legally autonomous entities governed by an eligible entity that is fiscally accountable and under the governing structure as described by the charter.
2
3 6
11A. Fiscally autonomous schools (e.g., schools have clear statutory authority to receive and disburse funds, incur debt, and pledge, assign or encumber assets as collateral).
Some
11B. Legally autonomous schools (e.g., schools have clear statutory authority to enter into contracts and leases, sue and be sued in their own names, and acquire real property).
Some
11C. School governing boards created specifically to govern their charter schools.
Some
Clear Student Recruitment, Enrollment and Lottery Procedures  
Arkansas law requires open enrollment charter schools to be open to all students in the state and conversion charter schools to be open to all students in the district.

Arkansas law requires charter schools to use a random anonymous student selection method if interest exceeds capacity (and a weighted lottery may be used when necessary to comply with legally required desegregation efforts).  State law provides that prior year students who wish to continue in attendance at their open enrollment charter school do not have to go through the application and lottery process.

Arkansas law allows open enrollment schools to provide an enrollment preference for children of a school's founders (although these cannot exceed 10% of the school’s enrollment) and siblings of children in the school.
2
2 4
12A. Open enrollment to any student in the state.
Some
12B. Lottery requirements.
Yes
12C. Required enrollment preferences for previously enrolled students within conversions, prior year students within chartered schools, and siblings of enrolled students enrolled at a charter school.
Some
12D. Optional enrollment preference for children of a school's founders, governing board members, and full-time employees, not exceeding 10% of the school's total student population.
Some
Automatic Exemptions from Many State and District Laws and Regulations  
Arkansas law does not grant any automatic exemptions. Instead, it requires each charter application to identify specific exemptions desired and request those as part of the application process (which includes any requested exemptions to teacher certification requirements).
2
3 6
13A. Exemptions from all laws, except those covering health, safety, civil rights, student accountability, employee criminal history checks, open meetings, freedom of information, and generally accepted accounting principles.
Some
13B. Exemption from state teacher certification requirements.
Some
Automatic Collective Bargaining Exemption  
Arkansas law provides that open enrollment charter schools are exempt from participation in school district personnel policies, but that conversion charter schools are bound by school district personnel policies.
2
3 6
14A. Charter schools authorized by non-local board authorizers are exempt from participation in district collective bargaining agreements.
Yes
14B. Charter schools authorized by local boards are exempt from participation in district collective bargaining agreements.
No
Multi-School Charter Contracts and/or Multi-Charter Contract Boards Allowed  
Arkansas law makes it clear that each charter contract covers a single school site. However, it allows high-performing open enrollment charter schools to petition the state board for licenses to establish additional sites on existing charter contracts (with independent fiscal and academic accountability for each site).  According to the law, these additional sites do not count against the state’s cap of 24 open enrollment charter schools.
4
2 8
15A. Oversee multiple schools linked under a single contract with independent fiscal and academic accountability for each school.
Yes
15B. Hold multiple charter contracts with independent fiscal and academic accountability for each school.
No
Extra-Curricular and Interscholastic Activities Eligibility and Access  
Arkansas law is silent about charter eligibility and access. Although open enrollment charter schools are LEAs and thus have all the rights and responsibilities associated with district LEAs, silence on these provisions results in a level of uncertainty.
1
1 1
16A. Laws or regulations explicitly state that charter school students and employees are eligible to participate in all interscholastic leagues, competitions, awards, scholarships, and recognition programs available to non-charter public school students and employees.
No
16B. Laws or regulations explicitly allow charter school students in schools not providing extra-curricular and interscholastic activities to have access to those activities at non-charter public schools for a fee by a mutual agreement.
No
Clear Identification of Special Education Responsibilities  
Arkansas law provides that districts are the LEAs for special education purposes for conversion charter schools and that charter schools are the LEAs for special education purposes for open enrollment charter schools. It also allows both types of charter schools to apply for additional categorical special education funds to help cover low-incident, high-cost special education services.
4
2 8
17A. Clarity regarding which entity is the local education agency (LEA) responsible for providing special education services.
Yes
17B. Clarity regarding funding for low-incident, high-cost services for charter schools (in the same amount and/or in a manner similar to other LEAs).
Yes
Equitable Operational Funding and Equal Access to All State and Federal Categorical Funding  
Per Arkansas law, a conversion charter school receives funds equal to the amount apportioned by the district from state and local revenue per average daily membership.

Per Arkansas law, an open enrollment charter school receives funds equal to the amount that a public school would receive, as well as any other funding that the public charter school is entitled to receive under law.  It requires payments are to be made in 12 installments each fiscal year. In reality, traditional districts are allowed to levy mileages (i.e., property taxes), and as a result open enrollment charter schools receive 18-23% less funding per pupil (when comparing operational and capital revenues). 

In reference to transportation, Arkansas law provides charter schools the same per pupil base amount for transportation as public school districts.
1
4 4
18A. Equitable operational funding statutorily driven.
No
18B. Equal access to all applicable categorical federal and state funding, and clear guidance on the pass-through of such funds.
Yes
18C. Funding for transportation similar to school districts.
Yes
Equitable Access to Capital Funding and Facilities  
Arkansas law gives open enrollment charter schools the right of first refusal to purchase or lease at fair market value a closed public school (or unused potions) located in a district from which it draws it students. It also provides that a district may not require lease payments that exceed the fair market value of a property, and that a district is not required to lease to an open enrollment charter school if an offer higher than fair market value is offered by an entity other than the charter school through a competitive bid process.
1
4 4
19A. A per-pupil facilities allowance which annually reflects actual average district capital costs.
No
19B. A state grant program for charter school facilities.
No
19C. A state loan program for charter school facilities.
No
19D. Equal access to tax-exempt bonding authorities or allow charter schools to have their own bonding authority.
No
19E. A mechanism to provide credit enhancement for public charter school facilities.
No
19F. Equal access to existing state facilities programs available to non-charter public schools.
Yes
19G. Right of first refusal to purchase or lease at or below fair market value a closed, unused, or underused public school facility or property.
No
19H. Prohibition of facility-related requirements stricter than those applied to traditional public schools.
No
Access to Relevant Employee Retirement Systems  
Arkansas law requires certified staff within open enrollment and conversion charter schools to participate in the state retirement system.
2
2 4
20A. Charter schools have access to relevant state retirement systems available to other public schools.
Yes
20B. Charter schools have the option to participate (i.e., not required).
No