Now viewing:

State › New York

Total Score: 114 out of 208
Rank: 8

New York's charter law was passed in 1998. In 2009-10, the state has 144 charter schools serving an estimated 44,204 students. The state empowers local districts, the State Board of Regents (Regents), and the trustees of the State University of New York (SUNY) to authorize charter schools.
New York law contains a cap of 200 start-up charter schools. It provides that 100 of them may be authorized
by SUNY, and 100 of them may be authorized by the Regents. In addition, it provides that 50 of the second 100 charter schools must be located in New York City, with the other 50 located throughout the rest of the state.

New York ranks the second highest on our four "quality control" components. It is also a leader in providing multiple authorizers available to charter applicants and in ensuring operational autonomy. New York still needs to provide facilities support to charters. In addition, it is nearing its restrictive cap on charters and will need to lift it to continue expanding on the promising returns in its charter sector.

How does this state compare to the model law?

Model Law Component Matches New York's Charter Law Scoring
No Caps
 

New York law contains a cap of 200 start-up charter schools. It provides that 100 of these charter schools may be authorized by the State University of New York (SUNY), and 100 of them may be authorized by the State Board of Regents. In addition, it provides that 50 of the second 100 charter schools must be located in New York City, with the other 50 located throughout the rest of the state.

1

The state has a cap with room for limited growth.

3
3

1A. No limits are placed on the number of public charter schools or students (and no geographic limits).

No

1B. If caps exist, adequate room for growth.

Some
A Variety of Public Charter Schools Allowed
 

New York law allows new start ups and public school conversions. The law does not address virtual schools, but a provision in it that no grade can be housed at more than one site has been interpreted by authorizers as prohibiting virtual schools.

2

The state allows new start-ups and public school conversions, but not virtual schools. OR The state allows only new start-ups.

1
2

2A. New start-ups.

Yes

2B. Public school conversions.

Yes

2C. Virtual schools.

No
Multiple Authorizers Available
 

Under New York law, applicants can apply directly to a district board of education, SUNY, or the State Board of Regents. SUNY and the State Board of Regents have statewide chartering authority.

4

The state allows two or more viable authorizing options for each applicant.

3
12

3A. Two or viable authorizing options for each applicant with direct application allowed to each authorizing option.

Yes
Authorizer and Overall Program Accountability System Required
 

New York law requires the State Board of Regents to submit an annual report to the governor, senate president, and speaker with the following information: number, distribution, brief description of new charters, assessment of current and projected programmatic and fiscal impact of charters on delivery of services by districts, data on academic progress of charter students compared to other public and non-public school students, list of authorizer actions on renewal/revocation, any other information the Regents deem necessary.

1

The state law includes a small number of the elements of the model law's authorizer and overall program accountability system.

3
3

4A. At least a registration process for local school boards to affirm their interest in chartering to the state.

No

4B. Application process for other eligible authorizing entities.

No

4C. Authorizer submission of annual report, which summarizes the agency's authorizing activities as well as the performance of its school portfolio.

No

4D. A regular review process by authorizer oversight body.

No

4E. Authorizer oversight body with authority to sanction authorizers, including removal of authorizer right to approve schools.

No

4F. Periodic formal evaluation of overall state charter school program and outcomes.

Yes
Adequate Authorizer Funding
 

SUNY's authorizing activities are funded in a unique away -- through two separate appropriations in the New York State Budget. The State Education Department's appropriation includes the majority of this funding within its allocation for "aid to localities." The rest of the funding comes from SUNY's appropriation, under the allocation for "university-wide systems."

1

The state law includes a small number of the model law's provisions for adequate authorizer funding.

2
2

5A. Adequate funding from authorizing fees (or other sources).

Some

5B. Guaranteed funding from authorizing fees (or from sources not subject to annual legislative appropriations).

No

5C. Requirement to publicly report detailed authorizer expenditures.

No

5D. Separate contract for any services purchased from an authorizer by a school.

No

5E. Prohibition on authorizers requiring schools to purchase services from them.

No
Transparent Charter Application, Review, and Decision-making Processes
 

New York law contains application elements for all schools.
New York law contains additional application elements specific to conversion schools.

As part of its application, New York law requires charter school applicants partnering with a for-profit entity to specify the extent of its participation in the management and operation of the school.

As public entities, New York authorizers must make approval or denial decisions at a public meeting subject to the state Open Meetings Law. The law requires that a denial of an application for a charter by an authorizer must be in writing and state the reasons for the denial.

Under New York law, district authorizers must forward applications they support to the State Board of Regents for final approval. The law also requires the SUNY to forward approved applications to the State Board of Regents, but SUNY can override any rejection by the State Board of Regents.

1

The state law includes a small number of the model law's provisions for transparent charter application, review, and decision-making processes.

4
4

6A. Application elements for all schools.

Yes

6B. Additional application elements specific to conversion schools.

Yes

6C. Additional application elements specific to virtual schools.

N/A

6D. Additional application elements specific when using educational service providers.

Some

6E. Additional application elements specific to replications.

No

6F. Authorizer-issued request for proposals (including application requirements and approval criteria).

No

6G. Thorough evaluation of each application including an in-person interview and a public meeting.

No

6H. All charter approval or denial decisions made in a public meeting, with authorizers stating reasons for denials in writing.

Yes
Performance-Based Charter Contracts Required
 

Under New York law, successful applicants must enter into a formal charter agreement with their authorizer. The law provides that such contacts must explicitly include the elements identified in the section of the New York Charter Schools Act relating to applications, including the roles and responsibilities of the school and of the authorizeer, student achievement goals, and methods to determine if students have attained the skills and knowledge specified in those goals.
In practice, charter schools in New York are generally held accountable for additional academic and operational expectations incorporated by their authorizer into the charter agreement. This practice is consistent with New York charter law, which states that the charter agreement shall include any other terms or conditions, not inconsistent with law, agreed upon by the applicant and the charter entity. The SUNY Trustees, for example, utilize a particularly comprehensive charter agreement.

New York law provides that the initial term may not exceed five years.

3

The state law includes many of the model law's provisions for performance-based charter contracts.

4
12

7A. Being created as a separate document from the application and executed by the governing board of the charter school and the authorizer.

Yes

7B. Defining the roles, powers, and responsibilities for the school and its authorizer.

Yes

7C. Defining academic and operational performance expectations by which the school will be judged, based on a performance framework that includes measures and metrics for, at a minimum, student academic proficiency and growth, achievement gaps, attendance, recurrent enrollment, postsecondary readiness (high schools), financial performance, and board stewardship (including compliance).

Some

7D. Providing an initial term of five operating years (or a longer term with periodic high-stakes reviews).

Yes

7E. Including requirements addressing the unique environments of virtual schools, if applicable.

N/A
Comprehensive Charter School Monitoring and Data Collection Processes
 

New York law requires charter schools to submit annual reports and audits.
New York law requires authorizers to provide oversight sufficient to ensure that the charter school is in compliance with all applicable laws and charter provisions (which include performance benchmarks). The state education department and the authorizer have joint oversight authority.

The law allows authorizers to put a school on probation and issue a remedial plan. If the conditions of the plan aren't met, the authorizer may revoke the charter.

In practice, authorizers may provide charter schools with additional opportunities for corrective measures. SUNY, for example, frequently utilizes a corrective action plan for schools that have moderate compliance problems, which is less severe than, and a precursor to, the remedial action plan set forth in the law.

3

The state law includes many of the model law's provisions for comprehensive charter school monitoring and data collection processes.

4
12

8A. The collection and analysis of student outcome data at least annually by authorizers (consistent with performance framework outlined in the contract).

Some

8B. Financial accountability for charter schools (e.g., Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, independent annual audit reported to authorizer).

Yes

8C. Authorizer authority to conduct or require oversight activities.

Yes

8D. Annual school performance reports produced and made public by each authorizer.

No

8E. Authorizer notification to their schools of perceived problems, with opportunities to remedy such problems.

Yes

8F. Authorizer authority to take appropriate corrective actions or exercise sanctions short of revocation.

Yes
Clear Processes for Renewal, Nonrenewal, and Revocation Decisions
 

New York law requires schools seeking renewal to apply for it.
The law provides that renewal applications must include a report on progress towards the school's educational objectives, financial statement, annual reports, and indications of parent and student satisfaction.

For renewal, the law references the same criteria that applies to the approval of initial charter applications - an applicant must meet applicable legal requirements, demonstrate the ability to operate in an educationally and fiscally sound manner, and show it is likely to improve student learning and achievement and further the purposes of the law.

New York law provides that the renewal term may not exceed five years.

New York law provides that revocation or termination may be based on insufficient student achievement, serious violations of law, material and substantial violations of the charter, or violations of civil service laws relating to employee rights.

New York law requires authorizers to provide schools facing closure with a notice of intent to revoke the charter, an opportunity to be heard, and time to correct the problems identified.

As with the initial applications, the law requires district authorizers to forward renewal applications they support to the State Board of Regents for final approval. The law also requires the SUNY to forward approved renewal applications to the State Board of Regents, but SUNY can override any rejection by the State Board of Regents.

The law does not state that renewal and closure decisions must be made at a public meeting, but authorizers are subject to the state open meetings law.

New York law requires applicants to establish viable processes for closure and dissolution.

3

The state law includes many of the model law's clear processes for renewal, nonrenewal, and revocation decisions.

4
12

9A. Authorizer must issue school performance renewal reports to schools whose charter will expire the following year.

No

9B. Schools seeking renewal must apply for it.

Yes

9C. Authorizers must issue renewal application guidance that provides an opportunity for schools to augment their performance record and discuss improvements and future plans.

No

9D. Clear criteria for renewal and nonrenewal/revocation.

Yes

9E. Authorizers must ground renewal decisions based on evidence regarding the school's performance over the term of the charter contract (in accordance with the performance framework set forth in the charter contract).

Yes

9F. Authorizer authority to vary length of charter renewal contract terms based on performance or other issues.

Yes

9G. Authorizers must provide charter schools with timely notification of potential revocation or non-renewal (including reasons) and reasonable time to respond.

Yes

9H. Authorizers must provide charter schools with due process for nonrenewal and revocation decisions (e.g., public hearing, submission of evidence).

Yes

9I. All charter renewal, non-renewal, and revocation decisions made in a public meeting, with authorizers stating reasons for non-renewals and revocations in writing.

Some

9J. Authorizers must have school closure protocols to ensure timely parent notification, orderly student and record transitions, and property and asset disposition.

Some
Educational Service Providers Allowed
 

New York law allows all types of educational service providers to operate all or parts of charter schools. It requires applicants seeking to partner with for-profit providers to specify the extent of its participation in the management and operation of the school.

2

The state law explicitly allows contracting with all types of educational service providers but does not include provisions regarding performance contracts and conflicts of interest.

2
4

10A. All types of educational service providers to operate all or parts of charter schools.

Yes

10B. A performance contract between the independent public charter school board and the service provider is required.

No

10C. Existing and potential conflicts of interest between the two entities are required to be disclosed and explained in application.

No
Fiscally and Legally Autonomous Schools, with Independent Public Charter School Boards
 

New York law provides that charter schools are education corporations, and deems them independent and autonomous public schools.
The law provides that charter boards of trustees are autonomous, and that the powers of charter boards of trustees includes the full set of rights of trustees under the not-for-profit corporation law of the state.

4

The state law includes all of the model law's provisions for fiscally and legally autonomous schools with independent public charter school boards.

3
12

11A. Fiscally and legally autonomous schools (e.g., schools have authority to receive and disburse funds, enter into contracts, and sue and be sued in their own names).

Yes

11B. School governing boards independent of the authorizer and created specifically to govern their charter school(s).

Yes
Clear Student Recruitment, Enrollment and Lottery Procedures
 

New York law requires charter school admissions to be open to students statewide.
New York law requires charter schools to conduct a lottery if applications exceed available seats.

New York law requires charter schools to provide enrollment preferences to pupils returning to the charter school in the second or any subsequent year of operation, pupils residing in the school district in which the charter school is located, and siblings of pupils already enrolled in the charter school. In New York City, the district preference applies to the community school district in which the school is located.

New York law allows a charter school to have a preference for students deemed "at risk of academic failure" (not defined) and students of a single gender.

2

The state law includes some of the model law's requirements for student recruitment, enrollment, and lottery procedures.

1
2

12A. Open enrollment to any student in the state.

Yes

12B. Lottery requirements.

Yes

12C. Required enrollment preferences for previously enrolled students within conversions, prior year students within chartered schools, and siblings of enrolled students enrolled at a charter school.

Some

12D. Optional enrollment preference for children of a school's founders, governing board members, and full-time employees, not exceeding 10% of the school's total student population.

No
Automatic Exemptions from Many State and District Laws and Regulations
 

New York law provides that a charter school must meet the same health and safety, civil rights, and student assessment requirements applicable to other public schools, except as otherwise specifically provided in the state's charter school law. It provides that a charter school is exempt from all other state and local laws, rules, regulations or policies governing public or private schools, boards of education and school districts, including those relating to school personnel and students, except as specifically provided in the school's charter or in the state's charter school law. Also, nothing in the state's charter school law affects the requirements of compulsory education established in state law.
New York law states that up to 5 teachers or 30% of a school's teaching staff (whichever is less) may be uncertified.

2

The state law provides automatic exemptions from many state and district laws and regulations and requires all of a school's teachers to be certified. OR The state law provides automatic exemptions from many state and district laws and regulations and requires all of a school's teachers to be certified for some charters and requires some of a school's teachers to be certified for other charters. OR The state law allows schools to apply for exemptions from state and district laws and requires some of a school's teachers to be certified. OR The state law allows schools to apply for exemptions from state and district laws, including from certification requirements. OR The state law provides automatic exemptions from many state and district laws and regulations for some schools but not others and requires all of a school's teachers to be certified but provides exceptions. OR The state law provides some flexibility from state and district laws and regulations for some schools but less for others and does not require any of a school's teachers to be certified.

3
6

13A. Exemptions from all laws, except those covering health, safety, civil rights, student accountability, employee criminal history checks, open meetings, freedom of information, and generally accepted accounting principles.

Yes

13B. Exemption from state teacher certification requirements.

Some
Automatic Collective Bargaining Exemption
 

If enrollment at a new charter school exceeds 250 students within the first two years of operation, New York law provides that all employees of the school will be considered members of the same union or employee organization that represents like-employees in the school district. Such schools may still apply for one of a limited number of waivers under the law. The law also requires that conversion schools are part of district collective bargaining agreements.

2

The state law exempts some schools from existing collective bargaining agreements, but not others.

3
6

14A. Charter schools authorized by non-local board authorizers are exempt from participation in district collective bargaining agreements.

Some

14B. Charter schools authorized by local boards are exempt from participation in district collective bargaining agreements.

Some
Multi-School Charter Contracts and/or Multi-Charter Contract Boards Allowed
 

New York law forbids an education corporation operating a charter school from operating more than one school.

0

The state law prohibits these arrangements.

1
0

15A. Oversee multiple schools linked under a single contract with independent fiscal and academic accountability for each school.

No

15B. Hold multiple charter contracts with independent fiscal and academic accountability for each school.

No
Extra-Curricular and Interscholastic Activities Eligibility and Access
 

New York law provides that school districts may offer extra-curricular activities to resident charter students, but does not require them to do so.

1

The state law is silent about charter eligibility and access.

1
1

16A. Laws or regulations explicitly state that charter school students and employees are eligible to participate in all interscholastic leagues, competitions, awards, scholarships, and recognition programs available to non-charter public school students and employees.

No

16B. Laws or regulations explicitly allow charter school students in schools not providing extra-curricular and interscholastic activities to have access to those activities at non-charter public schools for a fee by a mutual agreement.

Some
Clear Identification of Special Education Responsibilities
 

New York law is not explicit about which entity is the LEA responsible for providing special education services. In practice, the district of charter student residence is the LEA for special education purposes. The law provides charter schools with the choice of whether to provide services directly, hire a third party to provide them, or ask the district to provide them. It does not say whether the district must fund the provision of these services when schools opt to have the district provide services, but they do so in practice.
There are provisions in the law and regulations that provide supplemental high cost aid to for high-cost services for charter schools for students with low incidence, relatively severe disabilities.

2

The state law is clear on either responsibility for providing services OR funding for low-incident, high- cost services, but not both.

2
4

17A. Clarity regarding which entity is the local education agency (LEA) responsible for providing special education services.

No

17B. Clarity regarding funding for low-incident, high-cost services for charter schools (in the same amount and/or in a manner similar to other LEAs).

Yes
Equitable Operational Funding and Equal Access to All State and Federal Categorical Funding
 

The law requires districts to pass a proportional share of the funding formula providing basic tuition, as well as other federal and state aid, to charter schools located in their geographic area.
The law requires pass through payments to charter schools in six substantially equal installments per year. In the event that a district fails to pass along adequate funding to a charter school on a timely basis, the law empowers the New York State Comptroller to deduct funds owed to the charter school from district budgets and direct them to the school.

Under New York law, charter schools are treated like non-public schools for the purpose of transportation and the district must provide services similar to those it provides to regular district schools. The law requires charter schools to provide any supplemental transportation.

2

The state law includes some of the model law's provisions for equitable operational funding and equal access to all state and federal categorical funding.

3
6

18A. Equitable operational funding statutorily driven.

Some

18B. Equal access to all applicable categorical federal and state funding, and clear guidance on the pass-through of such funds.

Some

18C. Funding for transportation similar to school districts.

No
Equitable Access to Capital Funding and Facilities
 

New York law provides a charter schools stimulus fund, which provides discretionary financial support to charter schools for start-up costs and for costs associated with the acquisition, renovation and construction of school facilities. Currently, the state has appropriated approximately $3 million to this fund.
New York law defines charter schools as public agents that are eligible to obtain tax-exempt financing through various local industrial development agencies.

Under New York law, charter schools are subject to local land-use and zoning and building codes applicable to non-public schools which are considered less restrictive than state educational building codes applicable to district public schools.

1

The state law includes a small number of the model law's provisions for equitable access to capital funding and facilities.

3
3

19A. A per-pupil facilities allowance which annually reflects actual average district capital costs.

No

19B. A state grant program for charter school facilities.

Yes

19C. A state loan program for charter school facilities.

No

19D. Equal access to tax-exempt bonding authorities or allow charter schools to have their own bonding authority.

Some

19E. A mechanism to provide credit enhancement for public charter school facilities.

No

19F. Equal access to existing state facilities programs available to non-charter public schools.

No

19G. Right of first refusal to purchase or lease at or below fair market value a closed, unused, or underused public school facility or property.

No

19H. Prohibition of facility-related requirements stricter than those applied to traditional public schools.

Some
Access to Relevant Employee Retirement Systems
 

New York law provides charter schools with the option of participating in relevant employee retirement systems.

4

The state law provides access to relevant employee retirement systems, but does not require participation.

2
8

20A. Charter schools have access to relevant state retirement systems available to other public schools.

Yes

20B. Charter schools have the option to participate (i.e., not required).

Yes